Retail Strategist Argues Ground-Floor Stores Can Boost Entire Mixed-Use Project Value
Found this article helpful?
Share it with your network and spread the knowledge!

Developers typically judge ground-floor retail by the rent it generates, but Boston retail strategist Ann Ehrhart argues that metric captures only part of the economic story. Ehrhart, founder of EVERSTREET, said a property’s address does not change, yet its location value can improve. Every project her firm takes on begins with the same question: how can this location become more valuable than it is today? In her view, retail is one of the most effective tools for answering it.
Retail’s impact reaches beyond the walls of the space it occupies, Ehrhart said. A restaurant may take up 5,000 square feet, but a good one can make people want to live nearby, work nearby, visit more often and spend more time in the neighborhood. Real estate typically measures retail through rent, net operating income, occupancy and leasing costs, and in mixed-use projects developers also count it as an amenity that helps lease the apartments or offices above. “All of that is real value, but it doesn’t capture the full economic impact of great retail and great place,” she said. When retail makes a place more desirable, the benefit can show up in residential, office, hospitality and surrounding real estate. “The storefront creates the experience,” Ehrhart said. “The location captures the multiplier.”
Ehrhart points to research showing that walkable, mixed-use environments command measurable premiums in home values, apartment rents, and office and retail rents compared with locations that are not walkable. Municipal research she has reviewed also shows walkable mixed-use districts producing more property tax revenue per acre than lower-density development. She is careful about what drives that premium. “People aren’t paying a premium for sidewalks. They’re paying for what the sidewalks connect them to.” Restaurants, shops, fitness, entertainment, services and public spaces give people reasons to walk and reasons to choose one location over another.
That dynamic is not limited to established downtowns. In larger master-planned developments, ownership can shape density, streets, public spaces, dining and the connections between uses. “You’re creating a location rather than simply reacting to one,” Ehrhart said. That is where planning for future location value matters most.
None of this means developers should simply add more retail square footage. According to Ehrhart, the multiplier comes from the right retail, not the most retail. EVERSTREET evaluates fit through market demand, which it defines as the intersection of consumer demand and tenant demand. Once demand is understood, merchandising, design and underwriting should line up around it. “A great retail ecosystem isn’t necessarily the biggest one,” she said. “It’s the one people actually want to use and operators can successfully occupy.” That idea runs through the firm’s mission: the tenants in a space have to be supported by the community around them for the space to perform over time. Retail that the neighborhood does not use works against a project instead of for it.
At the storefront level, the obvious question is how much rent a tenant can pay. Ehrhart encourages developers and investors to ask a second one: what can this retail investment do for the value of the location? Those two questions do not always lead to the same answer. The tenant offering the highest rent may not be the one that does the most for residential retention, office demand or foot traffic. That does not mean subsidizing retail without discipline, Ehrhart said. It means being clear about what return you are trying to create and where it will show up, whether that is storefront income, residential rents, retention, office demand, visitation, land value or future development potential. “That’s when retail becomes a capital allocation conversation, not simply a leasing conversation,” she said.
For developers weighing a mixed-use program, the practical step is to look past what a storefront is worth on its own. “The question shouldn’t only be, what is this storefront worth?” Ehrhart said. “We should also be asking, what can this storefront do for the future value of the place around it?” For Texas developers and investors, that framing could reshape how retail is underwritten in mixed-use projects, potentially influencing tenant mix, project design and long-term returns as the state’s growth continues to spur new development.
